- Jun 12, 2014
- 772
- 897
Founding Member
Actually, it was a 10 - 12 yard curl route but, your point is valid.we got extremely lucky that a 5 yard curl W outer turned into a 60 yard td.
Actually, it was a 10 - 12 yard curl route but, your point is valid.we got extremely lucky that a 5 yard curl W outer turned into a 60 yard td.
No they do not. Feel free to ask the pumpers and they will disagree with you. Ask ground and get back to me.
Not sure where you took a wrong turn on this one but dude...come on.
What about 2014, we were lucky as hell to win that one 10-9. Tennessee choked 2 years in a row against us.
I don't expect much drop off on the defense (though there may be some), UNLESS injuries arise again. If we stay healthy, they'll be fine, but it wouldn't take much to knock us off track, that's for sure, and don't think teams won't know that.I think a TN or UK loss is not 100% out of the question if the defense drops like most think it will and we have a problem at the QB position still. It wouldn't surprise me at all to split those 2 games if we haven't found a decent QB yet.
I don't expect much drop off on the defense (though there may be some), UNLESS injuries arise again. If we stay healthy, they'll be fine, but it wouldn't take much to knock us off track, that's for sure, and don't think teams won't know that.
Because I think the guys up front (projected starters) are fine and will be good starters.How do you lose 6-7 draft picks to the nfl and have little drop off with out reloading in recruiting? If we were Bama...I might agree with you but this is pure homerism at its finest.
Because I think the guys up front (projected starters) are fine and will be good starters.
The problem is the big drop off behind them. Please read what I wrote. I'm expecting some stepback from last year, but I'm not expecting a huge drop off UNLESS injuries arise, I don't see why this is controversial.
I guess you'll just prefer your pure dumperisms
For the fans, no.Is the consensus at this point that 8-4 is good enough for another year of mac?
I'm honestly not so sure anymore bro. In a vacuum I dont know anyone happy about 8-4... but when you couple an 8-4ish type record with Mac, quite a noticeable amount of the same fans that say 8-4 isnt good enough in a vacuum seem to have little trouble defending it.For the fans, no.
Yea, as in I don't think we are going to see a huge dropoff..again, I don't see what is controversial about this.You said you don't expect much drop off...lol. That doesn't sound like much to me. Some or not much?
not much is still some. I'm saying they won't be as good as last year, but we aren't going to see a huge drop off, unless injuries arise, which I'm saying for the 3rd time now. If the injury bug hits, it ain't gonna be good.I'm tapping out right now. You don't expect much drop off. We'll revisit during the year.
Like I said, for the fans, it won't be good enough. This is year 3. This should be the year that any coaching staff should make gains IF they are going to make gains, no matter where the first 2 years were.I'm honestly not so sure anymore bro. In a vacuum I dont know anyone happy about 8-4... but when you couple an 8-4ish type record with Mac, quite a noticeable amount of the same fans that say 8-4 isnt good enough in a vacuum seem to have little trouble defending it.
Sounds like 8-4 seems to be the average between the optimists and the pessimists. So here's the next question...
We go 8-4, and then what? Is the consensus at this point that 8-4 is good enough for another year of mac? I'm not asking whether you think it will actually result in another year; Im asking you if you think it "should."