- Dec 4, 2016
- 6,063
- 6,875
It was soo much better when you pussed out and put me on ignore, time for you to do that again Nancy.
Look, Trash has been the only positive point of this offense.
It isn't Trash's fault that Mullinz can't stomach the forward pass and is wedded to running the option.
He is a damn Cinderalla story, playing this well for a kid that hasn't played much in college much less didn't play significant time in HS either.
That play was nothing compared to 20 fvkking wasted run and 20-25 sidways passing plays.
Ignore you, sh!tbird? I’ve done no such thing.
Half a second?I like Trask a lot, but let’s acknowledge something: at least part of the impression that he might be the second coming of Joe Montana is attributable to the way Mullen is using him while also protecting him from low percentage scenarios. He isn’t going to win games for you on his own. Unless he can shed half a second off his 40 and learn to cover the middle of the field.
True but this would have been a 17 pt lose if FF were playing. The sack was more on mullen for not calling a T.O when they were confused and didn't know what was going on. Instead, he just let it play out....with his inexperienced QB. Coaching lost this game pure and simple. Both teams had 2 weeks to prepare and you see the results.One of the few times I agreed with Danielson; the sack was a result of Trask’s inexperience.
Trask screwed up big time taking that sack.
So true. That was almost the equivalent of a turnover. A lost drive. But as many have pointed out, that play is not what lost the game. It was just one of a multitude of plays on both sides of the ball the entire 60 minutes.
Well, despite your manifestly evil temperament, at least you’ve chosen to pursue ignominy with gusto all the way to the depths of Hell. Way to double down and get after it. As sh!tbirds go, you’re a type specimen not to be trifled with.
Just remember who flinched first boy
B I T C H P L E A S E
The time for top 10 classes were the first 2 years....were not going to make any more noise than we already are and quite possibly take a step backward unless we pull into the top 5 and furthermore we need at least one true 5 player in each position group to raise the level of the others.I dont know if I posted it earlier but "Top 10 class" isnt good enough. Not even close. That will be probably 5th in SEC. Butters had a top 10 class (and they actually made it campus). Chump had nothing but top 10 classes, I think. Both left giant holes innthe roster, Butters worse than Chimp.
We need elite classes if we are ever going to catch Bammer and the other teams. now that could probably be the number three or number for class something with roughly the same number of blue chippers.
Our goal should be dominating again not being Auburn.
I know it isnt happening this year with this staff, but it has to start before we can expect to become elite again.
Just being butters isn't good enough.
I know dude but I'm trying to imagine a way to turn this shtt around.The time for top 10 classes were the first 2 years....were not going to make any more noise than we already are and quite possibly take a step backward unless we pull into the top 5 and furthermore we need at least one true 5 player in each position group to raise the level of the others.
Listen boy, like I told you a month ago. If you want to talk football, talk it.
Welcome to 9-3/8-4 records and 4th to 5th best in the conference. Hell Jimbo's getting top 5-10 classes at TAMU and in reality is probably neck and neck with Mullen in other aspects of coaching...He's also recruiting more directly with Bama/LSU/Texas and OU as well as the rest of the SEC...He would be winning the East by his 3rd season if TAMU was in our divisionI know dude but I'm trying to imagine a way to turn this shtt around.
Honestly I can't. I see this as what we bought when we hired Mullinz, poor recruiter and mediocre coach who wins half the games he plays against similarly talented teams and loses to all elite talent teams.
Dude, turn the channel.Shut the fvvk up, sh!tbird.
I dont know if I posted it earlier but "Top 10 class" isnt good enough. Not even close. That will be probably 5th in SEC. Butters had a top 10 class (and they actually made it campus). Chump had nothing but top 10 classes, I think. Both left giant holes innthe roster, Butters worse than Chimp.
We need elite classes if we are ever going to catch Bammer and the other teams. now that could probably be the number three or number for class something with roughly the same number of blue chippers.
Our goal should be dominating again not being Auburn.
I know it isnt happening this year with this staff, but it has to start before we can expect to become elite again.
Just being butters isn't good enough.