- Jun 5, 2014
- 37,065
- 98,163
Founding Member
The second half of the season would have been a freaking disaster under Franks.I've heard as many as 8 from some of the experts.
The second half of the season would have been a freaking disaster under Franks.I've heard as many as 8 from some of the experts.
The second half of the season would have been a freaking disaster under Franks.
We won games last year in spite of Franks, not because of him.FF ruins our season. Funny how he saved the previous one pretty much. We lost a decent running option with him and that would have opened up the passing a little more AND given the RBs a little more room. Im sure the stats prove me wrong. We lost a decent option when Trask came in but I thought Trask ran well a few times. I have told lots of folks if Trask ran a 4.5 we kicckkk asssss and maybe beat UGA.
thank you for that clarification. I had no idea the insignificance of the QB in a Mullen offense (or SOS for that matter) until you showed meWe won games last year in spite of Franks, not because of him.
same record, and for same reason.I was close. Didn’t think we’d beat the Barn.
I notice you didn’t deny staying in contact with Hornsby. I remember you once telling us that he was simply “misunderstood”.thank you for that clarification. I had no idea the insignificance of the QB in a Mullen offense (or SOS for that matter) until you showed me
the light.............even old people can learn new stuff.............HIGH FIVE!!!!!
So was Hernandez.I notice you didn’t deny staying in contact with Hornsby. I remember you once telling us that he was simply “misunderstood”.
I have no idea who you are talking about............but thats ok. Whatever fits your narrative with ribbons, losing and sdidn’t deny staying in contact with Hornsby.
But my hypothetical is what everyone based their picks on when the thread was started. The issue of FF starting over Trask is my other big coaching concern this season unless FF just practices better than Trask who is the kind of guy that’s just ok in training, but balls out in actual combat.
We would have at least 8 losses had Franks stayed healthy.
Ahhh yes, you know so much more than vegas, who said 4.5, that you know doubt bet your life savings on it.I'm not buying the, "...but I thought Franks would be starting," excuse for predicting more than two losses. I don't believe anyone would've increased their predicted number of wins if told that Franks was going to miss most of the season.