Napier views himself as a teacher, not only of his players but his staff and assistants... that is good when you are coaching at a lower level of competition. I'm not going to say he doens't understand the game of football, because when he is putting down his plan he knows what he wants. That works on lower levels as well, but once that plan needs to shift or adjust due to the opponent or situation, that is when things get a little dicey.
I didn't like the initial hire... He hangs onto the process, because that is just how his mind and logic works. I don't know if he is capable to make the real changes in his staff and himself that are needed to be here for the long haul. He would be a really good fit and coach at a lot of Universities, just like McElwain is a better fit for a lower level position. But there is a difference between the top tear or two of NCAA football and the rest.