- Jun 14, 2014
- 5,126
- 4,524
Founding Member
Last couple of years of offensive production not withstanding???Finally some physical evidence mac hates touchdowns and wants the bare minimum.
Technically the right decision is to fall down... then you can take a knee and the game is over with 0% chance of losing.
Realistically you score. If you can't protect a 2 score lead with that little time you deserve to lose.
Good point on the D. I really didn't think much about that. So, if the reason he wanted the RB to kneel was to save the D then I concur with McYets reasoning. If the reasoning is to be "safe" in case of fumble and on-side kick and bomb and onside kick and bomb and 2 point conversion??? Then he's not the coach we are looking for.I'm really surprised no one seems to consider the comparison of kneeling inside the 10 three times (with no real collisions) vs sending our paper-thin D back onto the field to defend the 2-minute offense (potentially a dozen or more plays). One of our better LBs is still nursing a hammy and a starting DT left the game. What could POSSIBLY go wrong??? Oh, but scoring makes the fans feel better, got it.
I don't blame a freshman for reaching pay dirt, but I also don't blame Mac for noticing how much time was left on the game clock. Wasn't everyone here pissed at his clock management before Franks threw it all the way to Cleveland vs the hillbillies?
From what I understand it was MAC HIMSELF who whined about the TD in the post-game interview. Not kids watching on TV or inept announcers. Are we not allowed to discuss it?
Jesus, your condescending post really pisses me off. You're like Sas on steroids.
He didn't bring it up or whine about it. He answered a question.
The issue was the tantrum Mac had on the sidelines during or immediately after.
Yes, because once in the victory formation, the shotgun snap/center qb exchange becomes infallible, because it is a victory formation after all. With 1:40, while the other team has three timeouts.
11 pages?
Who do you think he was telling, he should be on the ground? The ball boy? If true, we got bigger problems than I thought.As others have noted - he answered the question he was asked. He didn't bring it up or whine. Not that Ox cares, but his instigation of topics, regardless of stating his own feelings on the subject, really pisses me off. He is so disingenuous just to get the damn clicks. Then he acts surprised when it runs for 10+ pages.
We can play semantics along with imaginumbers all day. It wasn't a tantrum, at least compared to what my kids do every week, or I show the wife on weekends. Tantrums, by our definition, are a lot noisier and without sense of reason...mostly just emotions. However, even I caught it during the live broadcast and was laughing at him insisting the runner should have gone down.
For one - I didn't see the RB coach anywhere in those shots, so whoever claimed the RB coach was being 'berated' was both wrong on the who, and the what.
For two - it does show some level of football knowledge for a coach to say we should have gone down and run out the clock. However, his mouthing it off to a ball boy was caught on camera, inspiring talking heads to talk about nothing, and he earned the post game question.
==========
Bottom line, Davis is a freshman. I'll not criticize a freshman for breaking loose on a 4th down play and running for the endzone - ever. A junior or senior with some coaching and experience, maybe they are smarter, but a freshmen who has busted his butt all game long and just converted a fourth down to win the game...go ahead, you earned it.
Personally, I say take the points. I don't care how tired the defense has gotten for the last 2 min of the game, or how well their QB had been slicing us up. At that point in the game, I had confidence in my defense riding the wave of that score and shutting down Vandy. I have no belief at all that Vandy could have scored a TD in that last 1:38, much less scored two TDs.
In the short impact - team feels good for overcoming and winning more than a squeaker or with a last minute miracle. It helps with team emotion going forward, provides teachable moments for the squad moving forward with confidence rather than feeling like they could/should be 0-3 or 0-4.
In the bigger picture - nobody is going to care. What will be referenced is that we've won a game by more than a touchdown, we had a running game, we had a coach confident to go for it on 4th downs, a lot, and the team came through for him. Those 4th down calls weren't by a lack of faith in our defense to hold up, but confidence in our offense to perform and convert.
IWell, you know how slow it gets and any stupid topic gains unnatural legs during the off season. Seriously, the next head coach and his 2018 recruiting class can't get here soon enough.
Didn't realize you were so angry at me. Why can't you and I be pals?Not that Ox cares, but his instigation of topics, regardless of stating his own feelings on the subject, really pisses me off. He is so disingenuous just to get the damn clicks. Then he acts surprised when it runs for 10+ pages.
I'm really surprised no one seems to consider the comparison of kneeling inside the 10 three times (with no real collisions) vs sending our paper-thin D back onto the field to defend the 2-minute offense (potentially a dozen or more plays). One of our better LBs is still nursing a hammy and a starting DT left the game. What could POSSIBLY go wrong??? Oh, but scoring makes the fans feel better, got it.
I don't blame a freshman for reaching pay dirt, but I also don't blame Mac for noticing how much time was left on the game clock. Wasn't everyone here pissed at his clock management before Franks threw it all the way to Cleveland vs the hillbillies?
I don't think the kid made the wrong decision, but correct on that. I remember when a Philadephia running back in 2007 broke thru the dallas defense holding a slim lead and stop and knelt at like the 3 yard line. Game was over, two kneels downs later. Everyone praised the RB for the heads up decision.
There is no zero percent chance of losing. This is a silly narrative. Have you SEEN our QB play and center exchanges. They dont become ZERO percent just because it is a victory formation. That is toolbaggery.Technically the right decision is to fall down... then you can take a knee and the game is over with 0% chance of losing.
Of course it does, just like the percentage of onside kicks depends highly on whether its a surprise onside or a suspected onside. They are really two different plays. In the V form, the ONLY critical aspect of the play is the exchange, so the center and QB can concentrate entirely on a clean exchange. On a regular play where you are trying to advance the ball, the focus is on a million other things besides the exchange. To think that there is no difference in the percentage of botched snaps is ludicrous.The percentage of failed snaps doesnt change just because it is a Victory Formation as someone seems to think.
I'm hoping this thread gets to 1,000 posts.
Right. But I wasnt the one claiming that I knew "the stats" or pulling 10% and 25% out of my azz.Of course it does, just like the percentage of onside kicks depends highly on whether its a surprise onside or a suspected onside..
As others have noted - he answered the question he was asked. He didn't bring it up or whine. Not that Ox cares, but his instigation of topics, regardless of stating his own feelings on the subject, really pisses me off. He is so disingenuous just to get the damn clicks. Then he acts surprised when it runs for 10+ pages.
We can play semantics along with imaginumbers all day. It wasn't a tantrum, at least compared to what my kids do every week, or I show the wife on weekends. Tantrums, by our definition, are a lot noisier and without sense of reason...mostly just emotions. However, even I caught it during the live broadcast and was laughing at him insisting the runner should have gone down.
For one - I didn't see the RB coach anywhere in those shots, so whoever claimed the RB coach was being 'berated' was both wrong on the who, and the what.
For two - it does show some level of football knowledge for a coach to say we should have gone down and run out the clock. However, his mouthing it off to a ball boy was caught on camera, inspiring talking heads to talk about nothing, and he earned the post game question.
==========
Bottom line, Davis is a freshman. I'll not criticize a freshman for breaking loose on a 4th down play and running for the endzone - ever. A junior or senior with some coaching and experience, maybe they are smarter, but a freshmen who has busted his butt all game long and just converted a fourth down to win the game...go ahead, you earned it.
Personally, I say take the points. I don't care how tired the defense has gotten for the last 2 min of the game, or how well their QB had been slicing us up. At that point in the game, I had confidence in my defense riding the wave of that score and shutting down Vandy. I have no belief at all that Vandy could have scored a TD in that last 1:38, much less scored two TDs.
In the short impact - team feels good for overcoming and winning more than a squeaker or with a last minute miracle. It helps with team emotion going forward, provides teachable moments for the squad moving forward with confidence rather than feeling like they could/should be 0-3 or 0-4.
In the bigger picture - nobody is going to care. What will be referenced is that we've won a game by more than a touchdown, we had a running game, we had a coach confident to go for it on 4th downs, a lot, and the team came through for him. Those 4th down calls weren't by a lack of faith in our defense to hold up, but confidence in our offense to perform and convert.
Could not agree more. Get rid of this dog...lol.This thread needs to be sent to the dungeon, not for the content, but that it was allowed to run this long without a ham sammich option for a poll!