So to be accused is to be"guilty" of whatever the female accuser says ... even if she says it several
conflicting ways. Remember the accuser of those Duke Lacrosse guys. That case got right-away traction
because of the accepted belief that a woman would not lie about such horror. Long ago Tawana Brawley
saw an easy way to cover her errant ways by false claims of kidnap and assault.
My ex-wife was a vicious criminal = 1) embezzled $240,000 from my dental business 2) Forged Lorcet 10 Rxs
3) illegally used my DEA # to receive thousands of Lorcet 10 drugs through mail order wholesale pharmacy.
I'm not vicious but I do resent the total deceit. Every legal body, gave her the benefit, saying her decency was
compromised by drugs. Anyway, my point is there are cases where a woman is a tremendous liar.
Amy Osteryoung & Johnson say they have 1,000 pages of text messages (gotta be claimant's don't
they) that favor Calloway. ??
These accusations of sexual assaults, rapes are so very damaging that the accuser has to be responsible
for seeking acceptable presentation to LE special investigators. That expectation has nothing to do with
whether such cases are about a CFB player or some unknown guy.