- Jun 20, 2014
- 4,038
- 6,944
Founding Member
Winning is the most important.deuce said:I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.
but hanging 50 on em sure feels gooddeuce said:I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.
No reason you can't strive for bothdeuce coupe;n11800 said:I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.
Lucky you. You got to see 4 wins last year.deuce said:I like seeing our guys scoring big but I'll take 1 point wins over our major rivals everyday.:dance2:
Did you see us beat our major rivals last year?deuce said:I like seeing our guys scoring big but I'll take 1 point wins over our major rivals everyday.:dance2:
No. My comment says 4 wins. "." . And that's the point. Without the right philosophy, it's not gonna happen over our "major rivals" or vandy or gsu either.deuce said:I like seeing our guys scoring big but I'll take 1 point wins over our major rivals everyday.:dance2:
Having an average margin of victory of multiple touchdowns is what increases your margin for error and hence leads to more wins, because **** happens. You can look all you want, but you aren't going to find an example of a team sustaining success over several seasons while barely winning their games.deuce coupe;n11800 said:I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.
You have to have the capability to score 50 in order to win a championship imodeuce coupe;n11800 said:I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.
Sono, the conversation included the worry that our best qualified would not see the field … like seniority would line them up to play. That's why I asked.rogdochar said:Are other teams with poor OLs only playing their lesser QBs ?
missed the part about major rivals?ergator920103 said:Muschamp has stated he wants to get players in-game playing time to build depth. Blowing out weak opponents is how you do that... Idaho & Eastern Michigan are weak opponents. We need to blow them out not, win by one point...
ufgator812;n11814 said:No reason you can't strive for both
I thought the prevailing wisdom is that "defense wins championships"!t-gator said:You have to have the capability to score 50 in order to win a championship imodeuce coupe;n11800 said:I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.
my point is that a win by one point counts the same as a win by 50 points.deuce said:I like seeing our guys scoring big but I'll take 1 point wins over our major rivals everyday.:dance2:
the last few offensive juggernauts in college football have all been beat by better defenses.Bernardo de la Paz said:Having an average margin of victory of multiple touchdowns is what increases your margin for error and hence leads to more wins, because **** happens. You can look all you want, but you aren't going to find an example of a team sustaining success over several seasons while barely winning their games.deuce coupe;n11800 said:I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.
Well what part of statement contradicts that?t-gator said:You have to have the capability to score 50 in order to win a championship imodeuce coupe;n11800 said:I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.