- Jun 9, 2014
- 78,565
- 111,179
Founding Member
Ground and pound could never run up the score? Jeebus, it could never SCORE... against ANYONE. We nearly lost to Lafayette. We had to come from behind from a 15 point deficit to freakin Furman. We lost to Vandy. And every team we've ever played from gorgya. We didn't score a single damn TD against a Dwag team that gave up 50 to Bama and 30 to everyone else. Chimp/Dooley/Goof ball sucks balls and always has (unless you happen to have Herschel Walker in the backfield).CaribGator said:ntcrze;n10397 said:I think Driskel sucks and UF will be much better of when he is sent to the bench for good. The big problem is getting time to develop a new quarterback in a real game. Can anyone remember the last time UF dominated someone enough that the reserves were sent in? UF starts off the season with three cupcakes, but I wonder if UF will be strong enough to have the games in hand by halftime or soon after to get the backups in. It will be difficult for this staff to give someone else a chance at quarterback if they haven't had any playing time in a real game. If Uf doesn't dominate the cupcakes, will the coaches be brave enough to throw an untested quarterback into the fire when Driskel "driskels" (a verb describing bonehead plays) against a good team like Alabama? I know we won't know how god the team is until Sept. 20, but if UF doesn't hang at least a half a hundred on Idaho and have the game in hand by halftime, it's going to be a very long season of misery.
That has been one of the problems with Champs coaching! The ground and pound could never run up the score to allow the 2nd string quarterback to get game time experience, in fact if it wasn't for injuries almost none of the backups got playing time. Then they turn around and say there is a big drop off from the starters...