I understand your opinion, and I am not saying the D has been great, but with an objective eye, do you really think the players we have to choose from on defense are very talented? I think that Randy is doing the best he can with the players he has to work with. I am not defending Randy, but we have severe shortcoming at all 3 levels.
On the D-line we have 4 serviceable to good DE's. However 5 star recruit, sophomore Clayton is completely AWOL. He never plays. Does he suck that bad? At DT, both our starters are below average SEC DT's, which means our 2 backup DT's are not SEC caliber,
At LB, we are just plain awful, even when healthy. Kylan Johnson is our best LB overall, but he is hurt and looks to be done this season. Reese, Joseph and Moon who play the most are all too slow, and do not recognize plays quickly enough. All 3 are below average SEC LB's. Jackson and Garcia are not even serviceable back-ups.
In the secondary, the play of the true frosh CB's has been the biggest surprise in a positive way. They are holding their own for the most part considering they play a lot of man and we have little pass rush. Our safety play is just awful, as both Gardner and Washington are just horrendous in all facets. I would bench them and play Stiner, Davis, Stewart, Taylor, etc. and any other frosh who plays safety and hopefully they will develop in the future.
So my take when looking with eyes wide open is that we are void of talent on defense in a huge way. Yes Randy needs to make some changes, but objectively speaking, if we can hold our opponents to less that 25 points per game, I think we should be okay with that given this group