TheDouglas78;n116207 said:We don't have the evidence to support that, because of what we have had a quarterback the last 4 years.
But we do know that we endured sub standard qb play and a change was never made, until the end.
TheDouglas78;n116207 said:We don't have the evidence to support that, because of what we have had a quarterback the last 4 years.
TheDouglas78;n116207 said:We don't have the evidence to support that, because of what we have had a quarterback the last 4 years.
ufgator812;n116218 said:But we do know that we endured sub standard qb play and a change was never made, until the end.
TheDouglas78;n116220 said:And Muschamp and his staff are fully to blame for that. There is no reason for Florida to go 6 years without recruiting another 5 star quarterback.
oxrageous;n116202 said:I'm becoming more and more sure that he is.
You must have started your holiday drinking early. Every single source mentioned, PLUS what came out of Foley's mouth at the press conference, is that offense matters this time around.
gatormandan;n116219 said:But according to champ Driskel was a great QB and was going to make us proud. He had all the faith in the world he could get the job done and said Driskel just gets it. If you have that kind of confidence in your QB, why stay conservative?
ufgator812;n116223 said:Absolutely.
What if Ox and Dooely talk to the same person?The Original DC;n116234 said:Freeze has to still be in the mix here and would be a great hire. He's one of the really solid candidates that Pat Dooley hasn't crossed off. I know Pat Dooley has a whole lot of jackass associated with him, but he's not a known liar or a guy who gets everything wrong all the time. He claims a long time source very close to the program, band Freeze is one of his guys still out there.
The Original DC;n116234 said:Freeze has to still be in the mix here and would be a great hire. He's one of the really solid candidates that Pat Dooley hasn't crossed off. I know Pat Dooley has a whole lot of jackass associated with him, but he's not a known liar or a guy who gets everything wrong all the time. He claims a long time source very close to the program, band Freeze is one of his guys still out there.
oxrageous;n116205 said:Coach, what you don't seem to understand is that even if we had a "playmaker" at QB, Muschamp wouldn't let him make plays. We'd be a conservative crap offense even if we had freaking Aaron Rodgers under center.
Running teams like Alabama and Auburn still let their QB pass the football. We do not.
ATXGator;n116206 said:This was really clear during the South Carolina game. There was no reason to not let Treon throw the ball... make some plays and win by 21, but he just kept running... I don't get it. I hoped he would change with a better QB... this was proof that he won't change and it's why he had to go.
Will Muschamp does. He is Woody Hayes reincarnate.Coach9;n116256 said:I doubt that any coach enjoys playing low margin football.
You keep saying this over and over because you want it to be true, not because you really believe it.t-gator;n116224 said:Freeze ain't leaving , if he does I'll eat crow but it's seems very unlikely
TheDouglas78;n116192 said:So it's Bo Wallace's fault not the coaches fault for sticking with a quarterback his has a history, but with Muschamp it is the other way around. Double standard much? Nutt didn't recruit well, but he wasn't a great recruiter at Arkansas either. We assume there was no talent, much like the extreme apologists for Muschamp would spout how their was no talent for Muschamps arrive. Again not an excuse. If he is such a great recruiter, then you can't use that excuse in year 3.
Eli was a legacy, but was Duece McAllister, Dexter McCluster, Michael Oher, Mike Wallace? I guess the fact there are 24 active NFL players from Ole Miss just shows (10 less than Florida), so talent isn't an issue. As far as building a dynasty, no one is talking about building a dynasty at Ole Miss... so don't know where you are going with that one.
Cutcliffe couldn't win without Manning who was there from 2000-2003, then why was he 8-4 in 1999? Maybe Manning had 5 years of eligiblity? Cutcliffe was only there one year after he left, so who knows what he could have done. Oregon was a big name and Mississippi was looking for a change going 4-7 after a 10-2 year. Nutt **** the bed his last two years, but he was about as consistent as he was in Arkansas. He never was a good recruiter himself without his Arkansas ties. Tuberville was a good coach, but would he be a coach for Florida. Might be the best name on the list we are discussing, but like Cutcliffe he wasn't good enough for Florida, so why is Freeze?
Consistently getting 6 wins gets you to a bowl game, with their schedule just like ours they should be in one every year. I'm sorry if Vanderbilt and 3 "Who are they" schools don't give them enough leyway to get to a bowl game. That's more of a indications of the poor job their AD is doing in hiring coaches, not of a talent issue. They might have gone to Atlanta, they might not have. They did take care of Tennesse and Vanderbilt, but who didn't? Are they better than Georgia or Missouri, we'll have a better picture when Missouri plays Arkansas. So right now it's just opinion at this point.
oxrageous;n116262 said:Will Muschamp does. He is Woody Hayes reincarnate.
JD -------->Coach9;n116257 said:Did you see Treon's accuracy that game? Looked like JD on a bad day
We've asked "why" over ten million times in the last four years over every head-scratching aspect of the the football program. The answer is because he's an awful head football coach. It's the only reasonable conclusion after all this time.Coach9;n116267 said:Why would a defensive coach, who understands what's tough to defend, play a style that's not? He obviously sees some limitations that forces his hand.
Coach9;n116267 said:Why would a defensive coach, who understands what's tough to defend, play a style that's not? He obviously sees some limitations that forces his hand.