Miami isnt scoring 17 points unless Franks goes Full Drisktard and scores for them several times.
I see us somehow having a bad turnover. It's amazing re-watching old games and how many times we had bad turnover. Heck, as I was writing this (took about 2 hours btw because of this next part) I was watching The Best Game Ever Played in the Swamp and realized bad turnovers lead to FSU's first two scores. I had forgotten about that.
Which players were talking trash? Did I miss something?
Not sure if
this is what I'm thinking, but I know I've seen a few things. Side note, I was at both Miami '03 and UT '16 after the comments, big leads and blown games so I'm extra wary.
Love you, man. But it would be better if you would shorten it up just a bit. You're the wordiest poster.
Also I agree with the point Donk made, scUM isn't scoring 17 on us this weekend for many reasons we've all been talking about all off-season. Gameday can't get here fast enough. Go Gators!
My exact words when I told my brother I posted my Miami preview, "it's long". I just try to be detailed on why I think the things I do, throw in tidbits some may or may not know/realize and also cut some comments/questions off at the pass.
Also, I don't think they score 17 without turnovers..see response to Law above.
Exactly. We have maybe 6 guys that would have even been recruited by our championship era teams in 90s or 00s.
I don’t think that’s necessarily true but they wouldn’t have been recruited to be starters. Capable back ups.
I think we'd have several starters. I mean, go look at my average recruiting ranking of our receivers vs. 2006-08 I did in the 2018 preview. We don't have the once in a generation players like Tebow and Harvin though. Our running backs are more complete than Demps, Rainey, James (who was great at returns, so-so in the backfield), Moore and Moody. Though Demps (from an area high school) and Rainey had the speed for days we don't have.
You could be reduced to a Dooley column.
Whereas once upon a time Dooley did help me out and put a song from a band I was in a decade ago. (Had to use Whereas);)
I still have a hard time comprehending optimistic Law. It makes me nervous.
Or could it be good? I mean he's had a reason to be pissed off for years, now it appears to be looking up. Perhaps Law just is good at reading the direction of the program? (I can't find a shrugging emoji)
BW needs to post more with substance before he criticizes yours.
He's fine, seems more length commentary than substance.
if we do find a way to lose this game we’ll be fighting for 7-5 it’ll be a miracle to win 8 games and we’ll be nosediving faster than a bowling ball
I don't disagree with this. I think we should be much better than that, but losing this game easily could have that kind of impact.