T REX;n263029 said:
A bunch of three stars aren't winning the SEC. That's my position. If you disagree then fine but you are just pumping if you think it will happen.
Other than Mizzou against a weak SEC East, I don't think anyone has argued a team of 3stars will win much. Certainly not the SEC or anything bigger. To your point, a bunch of 3stars is exactly what we have today in terms of 2016 commits.
What many have argued is that the door isn't closed on 2016 commits, there are players to land and time to land them. This seems to be completely avoided on your part. I suppose, if we did have a team full of 5stars commits for 2016 at this point you would be happy? Though reality would say there is still time to lose them before NSD. I can understand you'd rather have them commit now and lose them than hope we can land them later - bird in the hand vs two in the bush. But time is a factor in adding, or losing, commits. Things can still go up, or down, from where we are today. Why do you not acknowledge this?
Fwiw, I got the 'dick' comment exactly as you meant my first read thru - not name calling, just 'bupkiss'.