Same question for you. This isn't really about a statistical analysis because you don't know the stats of the QBs that Trask will be competing against next year. That is, IF he's even named the starter.
Let's put it this way -- last year at this time, would you have projected Trask to have the stats that he has right now? No, because you didn't even know he'd be playing. So as we sit here now, how can you measure him against next year's QBs when you even know who they'll be yet?
Like Trask at this time last year, there are QBs with no stats to speak of at present who will find themselves under center in the SEC next year. Some may turn out to be better than Trask. I think that's pretty likely. One could make a pretty good argument that his much ballyhooed stats are largely a product of our lack of a consistent running game.
What I'm saying is, just watching this guy play relative to other quarterbacks I've seen over a lifetime of watching football, he's not the kind of player who makes my toes tingle, like good ol' Mad Dog Mandich used to say. I don't see him as someone you can rely on to be a game changer. He doesn't suck, he's not "trash," but he's simply not a championship-caliber QB in my opinion.